The mystic adventurer, Georges Ivanovitch Gurdjieff (1866-1949), is said to have visited Egypt and searched the ruins, looking for clues to the meaning of life. Although he might be speaking in parable, Gurdjieff explains he had come across a Map of Pre-Sand Egypt.
Totally Awesome History presents a homemade dramatization:
An actual “parchment” might have never existed. Gurdjieff’s teachings were designed to challenge your preconceptions and the map might have been symbolic of the path to knowledge.
Interestingly enough, satellite imagery confirms the Sahara was indeed a wet and green pre-sand place. The satellites reveal large lakes and multiple rivers throughout North Africa that have long since dried up. If Gurdjieff’s map existed, we might locate an earlier Egypt and have more clues as to how the civilization jumped so quickly from the pastoral and agricultural society of 3100 BC (just over 5000 years ago) to builders of stone temples and the Great Pyramid (2500 BC) in such a short space of time.
Some wonder if the advanced technology and math involved in pyramid and temple building were inherited from a lost, older civilization.
The iconic and enigmatic Great Sphinx of Egypt continues to be an attraction for tourists but some believe the Egyptians of the 2nd millennium BC were not the true builders of this carved statue.
After reading the works of researcher René Schwaller, tour guide and author John Anthony West decided to investigate the age of the Sphinx. He invited Boston University Geologist Robert Schoch to have a look. Schoch traveled to Egypt in 1990 and studied the ware from water erosion on the Sphinx mentioned by Schwaller that seemed to challenge the accepted date of 2500 BCE.
Schoch was initially skeptical and only expected to confirm the date assigned by mainstream Egyptolgists. He was astonished to find “the core body was weathered by by rainfall, by rain water (and) water run-off”. He returned to Giza many times and with a geophysicist performed multiple tests and gathered data. The results left him with no doubt – the core body of the Sphinx was older than the Pharaohs of Egypt!
Although subsequent investigations by other geologists confirmed many of his finds (for example, see geologist David Coxill, “The Riddle of the Sphinx” published in the Spring 1998 issue [Issue 2, pp. 13-19] of the journal INSCRIPTION: JOURNAL OF ANCIENT EGYPT), Schoch’s ideas were considered outrageous by Egyptologists. Other geologists gave alternate explanations for the ware but could not account for all areas of the Sphinx.
Despite Schoch’s dating, Zahi Hawass, the former Egyptian minister of state for antiquities affairs, objected to the new dating and asked what civilization could have possibly built the Sphinx in pre-dynastic times:
“…it is not possible for one reason …. No single artifact, no single inscription, or pottery, or anything has been found until now, in any place to predate the Egyptian civilization more than 5,000 years ago (or approximately 3000-3100 BCE).”
(see http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/pyramid/explore/howold.html )
As Schoch’s opinion was based on geological science, he had no answer for Hawass until a site in modern day Turkey came to light.
In 1994, Klaus Schmidt of the German Archaeological Institute began digging at a site in Turkey known as Gobekli Tepe and found a fascinating array of giant 10-20 ton T-shaped stone pillars with “carved in relief” animal sculptures. Because the site was deliberately buried, the researchers were able to radiocarbon date the material surrounding the stone, dating the site to be over 10,000 years old!
A video of Hawass and Hancock in debate seems to show Hawass as being unaware of the archaeological site at Gobekli Tepe and acting as though the ancient history of nearby lands is irrelevant to a discussion on Egypt:
Gobekli Tepe dates to 10,000-8,000 BCE, the time-frame Schock presently considers plausible for construction of the Sphinx. The site features many complex megalithic structures. Evidently, there were construction-savvy people who conceivably could have carved the Sphinx before Egypt went dry. Schmidt believed it was a holy site but others suggest it was a settlement (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G%C3%B6bekli_Tepe).
Currently, only 5 percent of the Gobekli site has been excavated but we can clearly see ancient people in the Near East were skilled and able to build large-scale structures much earlier than archaeologists thought. The Gobekli circular structures are much more refined than what was later built at Stonehenge (dated to approximately 2600 BCE)!
The animal carvings on the Gobekli Tepe pillars are done in high relief – meaning they are carved out of the blocks of stone. Likewise, the Egyptian Sphinx was carved out of existing rock. It seems high relief sculpture existed thousands of years before dynastic Egypt and the skill might have migrated from Turkey.
Nearby settlements exhibiting many other elements of civilization are located at Catal Huyuk and Nevalı Çori, also in Turkey. These sites date to 7500 BCE and 8500 BCE respectively and also feature carvings done in high relief (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%87atalh%C3%B6y%C3%BCk#Culture and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neval%C4%B1_%C3%87ori).
Elements of an earlier civilization might be present in Egypt as well.
One of the oldest sculptures know to humankind is from Germany and is known as the “Lion Man” or “Löwenmensch”. It dates to 38,000 BCE by carbon dating of material from the same layer in which the figurine was found. Instead of a Lion with a human head like the Sphinx, it has a lion’s head on a human body, similar to many half-animal / half-human painted cave figures dating back to 38,000 BC and found throughout Europe and Asia (Mind you, some think the sculpture is of a lioness standing on her hind legs). Such finds beg the question; could carvings from other or older non-African cultures have influenced the ancient Egyptians?
The animal with a human head is a common motif in the ancient Near East. For example, we find them in places such as Ebla (located in Eastern Syria) around 3000 BCE and pre-dating the accepted date for the Great Sphinx. The earliest “lamassu” or winged animals with human heads had the bodies of lions and are thought to represent the zodiacs, parent-stars, or constellations [Hewitt, J.F. History and Chronology of the Myth-Making Age. p. 85.
^ Jump up to: a b W. King, Leonard. Enuma Elish Vol 1 & 2: The Seven Tablets of Creation; The Babylonian and Assyrian Legends Concerning the Creation of the World and of Mankind. p. 78.].
Traditionally, academics date the first Mesopotamian civilizations to approximately a thousand years prior to Dynastic Egypt. Many have noted similarities between the civilizations. In 1992, H.S. Smith collected existing research to summarize the evidence (see http://www.egyptorigins.org/earlymigr2.htm). Smith notes similarities in how Egyptian and Mesopotamian heroes and rulers are portrayed as a Tamer of Animals and Victor over Enemies. There are similarities in Temple and Palace Facades and the same Floret Motif is found in Sumer and Egypt.
Historically, scholars have thought the Mesopotamian practice of making sun-dried bricks and architectural building such as the use of archs and recessed walls were borrowed by the Egyptians. [see Carl Roebuck, The World of Ancient Times (Charles Scribner’s Sons: New York, 1966) p. 52-53.] Architectural influences may have come to Egypt via trading or Near Eastern people migrations to the Nile valley. Just North of Africa, the ancient megalithic temples of Malta (in the Mediterranean just South of Sicily) also existed prior to the stone temples and pyramids of Egypt. These date from 5000-3600 BC and some feature high relief carvings. Is it possible that foriegners brought stone work technology to Egypt?
Ancient Stome-Building in Malta:
The pre-dynastic Nile valley “Naqada” culture was not isolationist. Evidence suggests they traded with Ethiopians and later with peoples of Canaan and the Byblos Coast of the Near East. (see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egypt#Predynastic_period).
While influences from the Near East likely played a role in Egypt, one cannot deny the civilization along the Nile had “local” or African influences as well and developed its own uniqueness. In Part One of this series we discussed the Black Mummy of Libya and how Africans from the West could have influenced Egyptian mummification and beliefs about the after-life. The Nile Valley also had several pre-dynastic cultures that survived along the river, hunting, gathering and working farms and it is probable much of what we call “ancient Egyptian culture” (such as the pottery, early hieroglyph writing, Egyptian religion, etc) developed in the Nile valley itself. ( see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ancient_Egypt#Predynastic_period).
In Southern Eygpt there was also a pre-dynastic culture that built with stone and like the later Egyptians devloped a deep fascination for astronomical alignments. The structures at Nabta Playa are not as technologically crafted as the later temples and pyramids but demonstrate that pre-dynastic Egyptains worked with large-scale stone earlier than once thought, around the the 5th millineum BCE.
According to researchers Wendorf and Schild:
“Nabta may have been a contact point between the early Neolithic groups along the Nile who had an agricultural economy and the cattle pastoralists in the Eastern Sahara. The functional separation of these two different economies may have played a significant role in the emergence of complexity among both groups…”
(Wendorf and Schild, https://web.archive.org/web/20110806140123/http://www.comp-archaeology.org/WendorfSAA98.html ):
The European of the 19th century might have thought many Africans “primitive” but failed to understand the extent a culture is deeply linked with its physical environment. A pastoral culture developed to survive a harsh arid environment such as that of the Dinka of Southern Sudan, may not seem technologically sophisticated but they do have an elaborate social system and resilient means for survival. Some video of the Dinka:
In Part One, we learned that the ancient Egyptians were not the first to practice advanced mummification in Africa. The so-called “primitives” were more advanced than Europeans once thought and seemed to have placed an emphasis on the possibility of an after-life.
Italian professor Savino di Lernia believes ancient cattle herders were responsible for the Black Mummy. Not far from Uan Muhuggiag, Savino discovered evidence for an ancient cattle cult in Libya but the extent of the cattle cult in North Africa is what he finds most striking. For example, there existed a cattle cult at Nabta Playa as well:
“The archaeological evidence gathered at Nabta is really spectacular. The cattle burials found and excavated there represent the greatest concentration in prehistoric North Africa.”
(see Savino di Lernia , Aridity, Cattle, and Rites. Social responses to rapid environmental changes in the Saharan Pastoral societies, 6500-5000 yr BP by Di Lernia, Savino. 1994. http://at.yorku.ca/c/a/m/u/24.htm)
According to researchers Wendorf and Schild:
“… there are many aspects of political and ceremonial life in the Pre-dynastic and Old Kingdom (of Dynastic Egypt) that reflects a strong impact from Saharan cattle pastoralists…”
“A major change occurred in the character of the Neolithic society at Nabta occurred around 7500 years ago, following a major drought which drove the previous groups from the desert. The groups who returned to the desert now clearly had a complex social system that expressed a degree of organization and control not previously seen in Egypt. They sacrificed young cows and buried them in clay-lined and roofed chambers covered by rough stone tumuli, they erected alignments of large, unshaped stones, they built Egypt’s earliest astronomical measuring device (a “calendar circle” which appears to have been used to mark the summer solstice), and they constructed more than 30 complex structures having both surface and subterranean features.”
( see https://web.archive.org/web/20110806140123/http://www.comp-archaeology.org/WendorfSAA98.html )
The stone circle at Nabtya Playa is especially interesting due to its astronomical alignments and seeming calendar-like function. Some believe it to be the oldest such calendar on Earth. Archeo-astronomers have been trying to decipher the meaning of its alignments.
It is clear than the people of Nabta Playa placed much significance on the stars, just like the dynastic Egyptians. The pyramids and Sphinx have astronomical alignments.
It begs the question, ‘Did the ancient people of Nabta Playa move to the Nile valley and eventually build the pyramids and temples of Egyptian civilization?’
Egyptologist Mark Lehner cautions:
“It makes sense, but not in a facile, direct way. You can’t go straight from these megaliths to the pyramid of Djoser”.
In a relatively short period of time, the ancient Egyptians were able to gain the technology and know-how to build the Great Pyramid. With it’s astronomical alignments and 2.3 million blocks of stone, some weighing 70 tons (like those above the King’s chamber), the formidable task of building the Great Pyramid would require knowledge of math, physics and engineering. Some will point out that the Great Pyramid was not the first in Egypt. The earliest is the Pyramid of Djoser, built sometime between 2630 BCE–2611 BCE . Did the ancient Egyptians acquire the knowledge and skill to construct the Great Pyramid over a 140-year time span? Or, was there an older stone-working craft that might have helped them? Mysteriously, ancient pyramidal structures are found throughout the world and seem to be centers of cultural and religious significance.
The first Egyptian pyramids were built around the same time as the first pyramidal Ziggaruts of the Mesopotamians. Did the civilizations inherit their stone building from a more ancient people?
The Osirian at Abydos, Egypt
Alternative writer Robert Anthony West argues that some ruins in Egypt are older than most Egyptologists believe. He cites the Osirian Temple (or Osireion) at Abydos, Egypt as an example.
A viewing of the Osirian is available on Youtube (The footage from 00:42 to 04:09 shows the Osirian):
The Osirion is officially thought to have been built during the reign of Seti I but even the editors of Wikipedia seem to allow contributors to question official assumptions:
“The Osirion was originally built at a considerably lower level than the foundations of the temple of Seti, the new kingdom pharaoh who ruled from 1294 – 1279 BC. While there is disagreement as to its true age, Peter Brand says it “can be dated confidently to Seti’s reign” despite the fact that it is situated at a lower depth than the structures nearby, that it features a very different architectural approach, and that it is frequently flooded with water which would have made carving it impossible had the water level been the same at the time of construction”.
The megalithic granite, 25 foot 50-60 ton titanic blocks used in its construction are very out-of-step with most Egyptian dynastic temples, especially that of Seti I, who did build the temple next door out of smaller blocks of limestone. Some researchers have commented that the Osirion is similar to the limestone valley temple (adjacent and close to the Sphinx) at Giza but unlike any other temple in Egypt, the Osirion was built below ground level.
Pioneering archaeologists Finders Petrie and Margaret Alice Murray wondered if the Osirion existed before Seti I. After excavations were completed, Miss Murray explained:
“The temple of Seti is “L” shaped, the Osirion located beyond the central chapels. Thus the support areas are located on the side, rather than behind the central chapel, as they are in other temples. This conveys the idea that either the Osirion was considered more important than the chapels (Egyptian temples are arranged in a progression from the common to the most holy), or that it was pre-existing and Seti built his temple carefully in line with it… this was the building for the special worship of Osiris and the celebration of the Mysteries, and this appears to me to be the true explanation, for many reasons. Each reason may not be convincing in itself, but the accumulation of evidence goes to prove the case. There is no tomb even among the Tombs of the Kings that is like it in plan… It is only to be expected that Osiris, one of the chief deities of Egypt, should have a special place of worship at Abydos, where he was identified with the local god. And that it should be a part of the temple dedicated to the worship of the dead, and which had special chambers set apart for the celebration of the Osirian mysteries is very natural….”
(quoted from The Osirion at Abydos (Abtu) by Sir William Flinders Petrie and Margaret Alice Murray, 1904. Originally published in: Egyptian Research Account — Ninth year: 1903, see http://ascendingpassage.com/Osirion-at-Abydos.htm for a copy of the report)
Recently in 2016, the Egyptian Ministry of Antiquities found very old sections of Abydos dating to 5,316 BCE. This pre-dates the dynastic period of the pharaohs and the ruins were buried only 400 meters away from the temple of Seti I and the Osirion (see http://observer.com/2016/11/egyptian-archaeologists-just-discovered-a-7000-year-old-lost-city-along-the-nile/ ).
Re-Enter the Map
So a lot went on before the Pharaohs arrived on the scene. A map of pre-sand Egypt might identify archaeological sites and give us answers. It might help us link the Black Mummy, Nabtya Playa, the Great Sphinx and the Osirion together into a coherent picture, solving many problems of ancient Egyptian history.
Perhaps there was an older pre-dynastic civilization present in ancient North Africa and the Near East. The Alternative research community have long considered the possibility. Such a civilization might even be the parent to the others, accounting for similarities we find in Mesopotamia and Egypt.
To be continued in part 3.